Skip Navigation

Health

Letters to the Editor

Drawing the line between different types of access

Stevan Harnad

5 November 2003 | EN

In response to your editorial Communicating science in an electronic era, I suggest prominently and explicitly distinguishing open access no-toll access from either lower-toll access or access-toll subsidy.

And we clearly should distinguish also the research access problem – which is a primarily a problem of the research community — from the journal cost or journal budget problem, which (despite the weak links between the two problems) is primarily a problem of the library community and the publishing community. Researchers have an interest in the latter, to be sure, but lower-toll access is not only not a solution to the problem of open access, but, as oft-noted, a trojan horse, likely to wed us more strongly to the toll-based status quo.

The bottom line to always remember that even if all journals were non-profit and sold 'at-cost', the toll-barriers and access-problems would still be there, and it would still be true that all research was inaccessible to most of its would-be users — a circumstance that is no longer either necessary or tolerable in the online age.

Add your comment

All comments are subject to approval and we reserve the right to edit comments containing inappropriate/unsuitable language. SciDev.Net holds copyright for all material posted on the website. Please see terms of use for further details.

You need to be signed in to post a comment or to email a consenting comment author. Please sign in or sign up.

Back to Letters to the Editor
To the top